Skip to main content

Reviewed by Artha Research·Last updated 13 April 2026

Comparison

NPS vs PPF

Which retirement lock-in is worth it for your tax bracket? Compare NPS equity returns against PPF's guaranteed, tax-free compounding.

Your numbers

Same monthly contribution — NPS with equity allocation vs PPF with guaranteed rate.

₹5K

Save & share this scenario

Bookmark these inputs, copy a link, or send the result to someone.

Verdictmedium confidence

Lump-sum at retirement

₹41.2L

PPF wins on tax-free, guaranteed returns

PPF maturity is ₹1.1L more than NPS lump-sum. PPF is fully tax-free (EEE) with sovereign guarantee.

PPF is capped at 15 years per account. For longer horizons, NPS equity allocation may catch up.

Head to head

NPS lump-sum vs PPF

NPS

₹40.1L

PPF

₹41.2L

Winner

PPF wins by 3%.

PPF's guaranteed 7.1% compounds safely.

NPS total corpus

₹66.9L

NPS lump-sum

₹40.1L

NPS annuity portion

₹26.8L

PPF maturity

₹41.2L

Total invested

₹15L

NPS corpus over time

Year-by-year NPS growth path

₹1Cr₹50L₹0
Yr 1Yr 6Yr 11Yr 15Yr 20Yr 25

NPS locks 40% in annuity at retirement

You cannot withdraw the full NPS corpus — at least 40% must be used to purchase an annuity. PPF has no such restriction.

PPF is fully tax-free (EEE)

PPF contributions get 80C deduction, interest is tax-free, and maturity is tax-free. NPS lump-sum withdrawal (up to 60%) is also tax-free, but annuity income is taxable.

At a glance

What it compares
NPS total corpus (with annuity split) vs PPF maturity. Same monthly contribution, different risk-return profiles.
Key insight
NPS can build a larger corpus but locks 40% in annuity. PPF is fully liquid at maturity and tax-free.
Who should use this
Anyone deciding between NPS and PPF for their long-term retirement allocation.
Verdict logic
Compares NPS lump-sum portion against PPF maturity. NPS wins on corpus size; PPF wins on flexibility and tax treatment.

How It Works

This is the drill-down layer. The flagship flow leads with a recommendation, and this page lets you inspect the underlying model.

  • NPS corpus via SIP FV formula. PPF via annual compounding at declared rate.
  • Delta = NPS lump-sum − PPF maturity.

Assumptions

The recommendation stays blunt, but the assumptions remain visible.

  • NPS returns assume equity-heavy allocation.
  • PPF rate assumed constant at current rate.
  • PPF capped at 15 years per account.

FAQ

The follow-up questions people usually ask after the main recommendation is already clear.

Can I invest in both NPS and PPF?

Yes. Many planners recommend both: NPS for equity exposure + 80CCD(1B) deduction, PPF for guaranteed debt allocation + 80C.

Which has better tax benefits?

NPS gets an additional ₹50k deduction under 80CCD(1B) beyond the ₹1.5L 80C limit. PPF contributions count within the 80C limit. NPS wins on deduction; PPF wins on tax-free maturity.

Sources & references

Every formula and assumption above is grounded in these authoritative sources.